And when it comes to the differences between the movie and the book, the biggest disparity comes down to structure. No one actually knows what happened to Fawcett, but the book by David Grann - which got its start as a 2005 New Yorker article - gives the most-detailed account of his ill-fated expedition. Then, on one such expedition in 1925, Fawcett and his team disappeared in the jungle - never to be seen again.
Fawcett was a British adventurer who became obsessed with finding the mythical Lost City of Z in the Amazon, and went on several expeditions to try and find it. But what differences are there between The Lost City of Z movie and book?īoth are based on the life of an actual explorer, Percy Fawcett. Kong: Skull Island was a success, there are new Indiana Jones and Tomb Raider movies in the works, and then there's The Lost City of Z, which is based on the book of the same name. And while such movies are rare these days, they seem to be on the comeback trail.
The type where an expedition heads off to some exotic land in search of treasure and encounters far more than they bargained for. I've always been a sucker for old school adventure movies.
0 kommentar(er)
